The Vulnerability of Man Essay example -- essays research papers

The Vulnerability of ManNature dwarfs us. The jungle absorbs us. Struggling to brave out in the middle of an enticing jungle, one truly challenges his own restraints to the come-on of the jungle of the mutual exclusiveness of an abyss which lies so closely below us. alone of our days and ways are a fragile structure match agitatedly atop the hungry jaws of nature that allow effortless devour us. A happy life is a daily amnesty from this knowledge. Joseph Conrads cheek of Darkness and Francis Ford Coppolas divine revelation Now share a common theme where the feeble human cannot restrain the domination of the jungle. Those who live in a fools paradise volition suffocate in a fools paradise, and those who discover the horrors of life will die in the jungle. Colonel Kurtz in Apocalypse Now and Captain Kurtz in fondness of Darkness dupe both been lured into a God-like life in the jungle. Willard and Marlow both travel a long way down a river to attempt to rescue Kurtz, or k ill him. The Kurtz in both stories have lost restraint to the wilderness, while Willard and Marlow fight hard to keep theirs. The curtain raising scene in the movie captures a distraught Willard having just returned from the Vietnam War. Willard is pouncing some in his hotel room as though a savage. Only subsequent it is revealed that he is resisting the temptation of returning to the jungle. When I was here, I wanted to be there when I was there all I could think approximately was getting back in the jungle (Captain Willard). This scene suggests Willards specialisation to resist temptation. Having already escaped from Vietnam once, he will do it again. The amour is however, the difficulty of withstanding the jungle is like pulling two burly magnets in opposite directions. Willard himself deals with a desire to escape into the jungle. He is uncertain of his reasons, nevertheless his physicality and mentality demands it. In Apocalypse Now, the Vietnam War only plays a surface role, a parallel for the jungle, in which both display the effectuate of corruption and destruction on man. The true significance of the story lays beneath the surface, as the horror of existence, the horror of strength, and the horror of an ability to kill without feeling.In the beginning of the novel, Marlow and four other Englishmen are stranded close to the lecture of the Thames Riv... ...ad put his restraint to test eventually swallowed him whole. As does in Apocalypse Now, both Kurtz die saying The horror. The horror. While the definition of this horror is understandably defined in Apocalypse Now, it is left unclear in The Heart of Darkness. These words might have no larger meaning at all. Though there is a constituent of madness to Kurtz, hes remained coherent tolerable for the audience to wonder whether in casting off all restraints in the jungle, he has discovered some dark truth about the world, a truth that horrifies him. His words might be a pronouncement on the univ erse we all inhabit, as in Apocalypse Now, Colonel Kurtzs uncovering of how fragile men live their lives is easily tempted by the wilderness, and most will fall into this trap. In the Heart of Darkness and Apocalypse Now, the stories contain symbolic imagery of the all-too-powerful nature against the defenseless man. Both stories contain a horror of which one has been given a definition, and the other left for the audience to define. The stories taste a mans capacity for evil and madness, and the level of possession necessary to survive the manipulation of nature.